Architecture or Just Real Estate? The Spirit Gap Between Our Skylines

If you look at the Mississauga skyline in 2026, you see a city having a conversation with the future. You see the "Marilyn Monroe" towers twisting toward the lake. You see the serrated, zigzagging edges of M City. Whether you love them or hate them, you feel them. They have a pulse.

Then, you look at the new developments in Burlington.

Despite being one of the most beautiful waterfront cities in the country, our new high-rises often feel like "copy-paste" architecture. They are safe. They are boring. They are glass boxes designed to maximize floor-plate efficiency while minimizing civic imagination.

Why does this matter? As a Digital Architect, I look at buildings as the "Hardware" of a city. If the hardware is generic, the "Software" (the culture, the energy, the pride) starts to glitch.

• Mississauga is taking risks to create a landmark identity.

• Burlington is often settling for "good enough," resulting in a "cold heartless stretch" of condos that lack a signature soul.

We have the most incredible natural canvas in the GTHA. It’s time we had architecture that is as unique as the shoreline it sits on.

Is Burlington becoming a world-class city, or just a very expensive hallway?